Sunday , 29 March 2015
Home » NEWS » EDITOR’S NEWS » Could eBay face California privacy wrath?
Could eBay face California privacy wrath?

Could eBay face California privacy wrath?

The next challenge for eBay could be the California Online Privacy Protection Act (OPPA).

 

The San Jose headquarted company could face the wrath of the California privacy enforcer over the massive hacking and potential data breach, which has seen 145 million user records potentially breached.

 

The 2003 California act, approved under the governance of Arnold Schwarznegger, details of the duty of Attorney General require that they “work with companies on privacy trends and offers best practice guidance” and that businesses advise “the Attorney General on privacy matters”.

 

Asked if eBay will face sanctions on its time to report, barrister and solicitor Stewart Room, told IT Security Guru that unlike the proposed European Data Protection Directive, for California there isn’t a set time period for the giving of notifications.

 

Room said: “The rule in California is that notice must be given in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, though there is a five-day rule for medical or health info. Judging from what I’ve read; eBay only discovered the hacks a fortnight ago, so, I think it’s hard to say that Californian law has been breached on this occasion.”

 

Jonathan Armstrong, partner at compliance group Cordery, told IT Security Guru that there will be some time restraints in other countries and some US states and they tend to dictate what happens in a global breach like this. He said: “Companies should not be too UK-centric when it’s a global breach.”

 

Asked what he thought about the time to detect the breach, Armstrong said: “I think we are seeing an increasing focus on the time taken to respond to a breach. Whether that becomes a big problem will depend on a number of factors including what (if anything) eBay were asked to do by law enforcement.

 

“As a general rule people need to be told quickly where there is a risk of harm. However sometimes there’s a need to delay – either to plug a gap before its public or to try and catch bad guys. Most US legislation allows extra time to report when law enforcement are still at the crime scene.

 

“Unfortunately, the draft EU proposals do not have a similar extension which may have the effect of increasing the harm victims suffer and lead to less chance of the bad guys getting caught. It is likely that people will be asking eBay exactly what went on – if they delayed we’re likely to see action from credit card companies and banks, US regulators, aggrieved customers and possibly regulators in Europe too.”

 

Toyin Adelakun, vice president of products for Sestus, said: “Generally, institutional, regulatory and legal responses to identity theft are immature and still under development, so personal responsibility needs to be the fore, for now.”

About Dan Raywood

Dan Raywood is the editor in chief of the IT Security Guru. A journalist with more than 13 years experience, Dan has been at the forefront of the information security industry.

As the news editor of SC Magazine he covered breaking stories such as Stuxnet, Flame and Conficker and the online hacktivist campaigns of Anonymous and LulzSec, and broke the news on the EU’s mandatory data breach disclosure law and a vulnerability which affected more than 200 sites.

Contact Dan on dan@itsecurityguru.org, by phone on 0207 1832 839