International Cyber Expo International Cyber Expo
  • About Us
Tuesday, 21 July, 2026
IT Security Guru
International Cyber Expo
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Security professionals doubt cyber insurance claims would be paid

by The Gurus
May 23, 2014
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Security professionals would not bother getting cyber insurance, as two-thirds believe insurers would not actually honour a claim if one was made.
 
A survey of 250 security professionals by AppRiver found that 32 per cent of UK businesses don’t bother seeking this increasingly vital cover, while two-thirds (63 per cent) believe insurers would not actually honour a claim if one was made.
 
Jim Tyer, EMEA channel director for AppRiver, said: “What this means for those respondents we spoke with during the show who were either unsure if their organisation had cover, and even those that did have cover but were unsure if they’d had to do anything different, 28 per cent would find their policies (if they have one) invalid due to this mandate.”
 
Gartner research vice president Paul Proctor said in 2012 that Gartner had “extraordinary difficulty in finding claims”, and suspected that claims often end in negotiated settlements so no one will talk about it. Proctor said that there is a danger of “buying into the sales pitch”, as the biggest factor is insurance companies investing in marketing meaning that you rarely see something written by someone who has a background in cyber insurance.
 
None of the respondents spoken with, who had cyber liability insurance, had had to make a claim on their policy. Tyer said: “While this could be viewed as positive, it did raise two thoughts. Firstly, it means there’s no reassurance for the 63 per cent of respondents whose faith in insurance is non-existent, unfortunately.
 
“However, more importantly, the likelihood that no-one has suffered a breach is unlikely meaning either a percentage of people lied, hadn’t made a claim even though they’d suffered a breach or, in my opinion the most probable, are blissfully unaware of their current security posture! Not a particularly comforting thought.”
 
Beth Diamond, leader of the claims management team for privacy liability at the Beazley Group, told IT Security Guru that there is more penetration into the market to accomplish, and she saw see new insured companies looking at risk regularly, but too often it was after having suffered a breach and been without cover or assistance in responding.
 
Commenting on the 63 per cent statistic, Diamond said she “smiles each time I am asked this question”.
 
“I have been handling cyber claims from my earliest time at Beazley, and can tell you from personal knowledge that not only have we paid out and continue to pay out material sums on cyber matters, but I have handled personally the largest cyber claims impacting Beazley insured’s, paying seven and eight figure sums (sometime policy limits) on cyber matters,” she said.
 
“I suspect that the media surrounding coverage disputes on cyber claims has created confusion about coverage generally for cyber, but cyber coverage from Beazley is real. That does not mean it is the proverbial ‘blank check’, and it is important that insured companies understand how coverage works, and how to maximise the coverage available, but the coverage is there and it is real.”

Tags: Insurance
ShareTweet
Previous Post

Trustwave – intrusion to detection can take 3 months

Next Post

New XSS vuln hits eBay as rubbish passw0rds persist

Recent News

secure-software-supply-chain-feature

1 in 4 businesses hit by cyber attacks through their supply chain in the last year

July 21, 2026
partnership

DigiCert expands its EMEA channel strategy with Ignition Technology

July 21, 2026
vulnerability

95% of Security Teams Blindsided by Vulnerabilities Between Tests

July 21, 2026
What Does the Cyber Industry Want to See From the New UK Government?

What Does the Cyber Industry Want to See From the New UK Government?

July 20, 2026

Eskenzi PR banner ad

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2026 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2026 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol