Home Editor's News Responsibility for malvertising lies with the advertising platform

Responsibility for malvertising lies with the advertising platform

January 9, 2014 | Posted by Dan Raywood

Malvertising is a consistent challenge which can see reputable websites having frames infected to serve up any matter of attack.

 

After Yahoo beat down malicious advertisements which redirected users to the “Magnitude” exploit kit, which was enabled following the infection of a third party, Sean Power, security operations manager at DOSarrest, said that the problem is that many banner ad companies allow JavaScript or other code inside the advert.

 

“This is something we have seen before. In our case it was an advertising campaign that included a DDoS attack against one of our customers,” he said. “For companies allowing these ads on their website, the ads should be sanitised before displaying to the public.”

 

Power said that businesses should find a balance of risk versus profit to deal with this type of attack, and techniques could range from simply “trusting that all ads are malware free” to digitally signing each ad and only showing the ones that have been verified as malware free.
He also said the responsibility should lie with the ad company to sanitise all of its ads;  although he pointed out all of the bad press will be focused on the site displaying the ads (in this case Yahoo).  “No one is going to take kindly to a “not my responsibility” attitude when they got a virus after visiting your site,” Power concluded.

 

“As with any other business relationship – do your due diligence. Find out if the ad company allows code to be inserted in the ads.  Anytime your business relationships have the ability to directly alter your customer’s experience, they should be part of your security review,” he said.

 

Also hit by malicious adverts was video-sharing website Dailymotion, which according to research by Invincea delivered a malicious executable file as a ruse to “clean” their “infected” machine. Visitors were automatically redirected via Javascript to a website that distributed the fake infection warning, and this then automatically serves up the fake anti-virus.

 

Luis Corrons, technical director of PandaLabs, told IT Security Guru that adverts can lead to exploit kits and that has happened a number of times in the past. “In this kind of attack, the site serving the malicious advert has not been compromised, so I won’t say the responsibility to sanitise the ads lies directly with them,” he said.

 

“However, it is in the company’s own interest to protect people using their website. The company serving the ads is the one that should hold most of the responsibility, as it is their platform the one being abused.”

Recent

Iran named as being behind attack on Las Vegas “Sands” resorts

Iran has been named as the perpetrator of an attack on a Las Vegas casino last year. After the Sands hotel and casino chain was attacked in February 2014, James Clapper, US director of national intelligence, told the Senate Armed Services Committee that the attack was by Iranian attackers which hit many of the systems (…read more)

February 27, 2015

TalkTalk admits to breach of customer data

Internet service provider TalkTalk has admitted that it suffered a major breach of user information, including customer names, addresses, phone and account numbers. As reported by The Register, in an email to customers TalkTalk said that it first saw a big increase in malicious scammers claiming to be from TalkTalk at the end of last year. (…read more)

February 27, 2015

TDW 2015 – How to deal with anonymised healthcare data securely

In the second and final day here at the Trust in the Digital World conference in Madrid, I have attended a panel debate on the subject of E-Health. With speakers from SAP, ATOS and hospitals in Spain, the concept was mostly on sharing anonymised data for the benefit of research and action, whilst keeping the patient (…read more)

February 26, 2015