Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Wednesday, 3 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

PCI version 3.0 released with greater focus on modern attacks and authentication

by The Gurus
September 10, 2020
in Opinions & Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
The anticipated changes to the payment card industry data security standard (PCI DSS) was published today.
Overall there is better clarification of the 12 steps of the standard as well as to remain current with attack vectors and to address the need for physical security of payment terminals and address requests for more stringent scoping and testing.
Altogether there are 11 main changes to requirements 5 (use and regularly update anti-virus software on all systems commonly affected by malware), 8 (assign a unique ID to each person with computer access), 9 (restrict physical access to cardholder data), 11 (regularly test security systems and processes) and 12 (maintain a policy that addresses information security).
The change to five will require “evaluate evolving malware threats for any systems not considered to be commonly affected” while three changes to step eight around using unique authentication credentials by service providers and linking tokens to an individual account.
The two changes to requirement 9 are on controlling physical access to sensitive areas for onsite personnel, including a process to authorise access and revoke access immediately upon termination, and protecting devices that capture payment card data via direct physical interaction with the card from tampering and substitution.
Two changes to requirement 11 are implementing penetration testing and being able to respond to any alerts detected by the change detection mechanism, while two changes to requirement 12 regard maintaining information about which PCI DSS requirements are managed by each service provider.
Bernard Zelmans, general manager EMEA at FireMon, welcomed the changes as a move from a security check box posture to a more holistic risk management approach.  “This will hopefully entail a more security centric approach to PCI compliance rather than the least common denominator approach of earlier versions of PCI,” he said.
“Moving to a risk management centric goal is one that many within the industry have clamoured for, and if the new risk based approach will result in organisations adopting better security standards, then PCI DSS 3.0 will have succeeded where its predecessors have come up short.”
Ross Brewer, vice president and managing director for international markets, LogRhythm, said: “A big concern is that organisations tend to view compliance as a one-off obligation, taking a check-box approach which leaves security a mere afterthought once certification has been achieved. This is simply unforgivable in this day and age, and indicates a clear lack of common sense – particularly when security breaches are reported so frequently and customer confidence continues to nosedive.
“Instead, security must be an ongoing, active process – which is where I welcome the introduction of security training and collaborative efforts as part of the new compliance requirements.”
Michael Aminzade, director of delivery for EMEA & APAC at Trustwave, welcomed the changes but said that the risk management area of PCI 3.0 still needs more work.
“The main area of concern is that even though the new standards references risk management strategies that must be met, the standard doesn’t enforce companies to adopt any of those strategies,” he
said.
“In particular the standard doesn’t address the fact that risk assessments need to be done by an industry-certified professional and are only performed on an annual basis. Also, PCI DSS 3.0 does not include any changes surrounding mobile security.  Merchants are struggling with how to protect mobile payment solutions and integrating mobile devices into their organizations.  The Council released a best practices guide for mobile security more than a year ago, but it would be more beneficial to release additional guidance pertaining to mobile data security.
Lastly, the PCI DSS 3.0 standard needs a section that highlights the expanded use of security tools (beyond vulnerability scanning) that all merchants should use.”
Also, Kurt Hagerman, director of information security at FireHost, said that the revisions will mean an increase in time and costs for organisations to remain compliant, especially with the “business as usual activity” as a means of maintaining on-going PCI DSS compliance.
He said: “The revisions made for the latest version of the PCI standards will go a long way to improving the quality of assessments and reducing overall risk. Whereas with previous iterations of the standards companies would be told how to meet each requirement, with PCI DSS 3.0 they are given both a more detailed explanation of the requirement and the ways of meeting it – a much more effective approach indeed.”
ShareTweet
Previous Post

Microsoft to release eight patches next week, but nothing for TIFF vulnerability

Next Post

US banks to face security test, as initial reports show Waking Shark 2 was a success

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol