Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Thursday, 4 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

South Korea faces second major breach of 2014

by The Gurus
March 10, 2014
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

South Korea has suffered its second major data breach in three months, with a telecommunications company KT Corporation affected by the loss of 12 million customer records.
 
According to the Register, the South Korean Government has launched an inquiry into the breach. Despite two hackers and the CEO of a telemarketing firm being arrested last week on suspicion of infiltrating the telco giant’s servers and stealing the data, the South Korean telecoms ministry has now launched a probe, apparently ordering KT to inform customers about what happened and to allow them to check if they’ve been affected on a special website.
 
The story claimed that the data theft apparently went undetected by KT for an entire year with the suspects allegedly snatching up to 300,000 records in a single day. The nabbed details included names, registration numbers and bank account info.
 
Michael Sutton, VP of security research at Zscaler, said: “The fact that the breach at KT Corporation went undetected for a year is indicative of a disturbing trend. Even in the case of the Target and Neiman Marcus breaches, the breaches went undetected for 18 and 106 days respectively. Enterprises continue to focus almost exclusively on preventive controls and ignore detective controls.
 
“The unfortunate reality of the current cyber landscape is that infections and breaches will occur. Controls must be in place to quickly identity such scenarios and mitigate the damage. Massive files containing sensitive data such as credit card numbers and personally identifiable information should not be able to be exfiltrated from a corporate network without triggering a number of red flags.”
 
Back in January, senior executives from bank and credit card firms resigned after 20 million records from the internal servers of KB Kookmin Card, Lotte Card and NH Nonghyup Card were stolen. The data included bank account numbers, addresses and credit ratings and part of the leak occurred at local banks that shared their customer data with the affiliated credit card firms.
 
In December, personal data of some 130,000 customers of Standard Chartered Bank Korea and Citibank Korea was also stolen, the largest number in the history of the banking sector in South Korea.
 
TK Keanini, CTO of Lancope, said: “To be fair, the threat KT faces may be very advanced and, in those cases, traditional defenses are not enough. The sad reality is that these security events will continue until KT up’s their game. KT is not the first to face this type of repetitive breaches as they make an attractive target for many types of adversaries.
 
“My advice would be this: while you may never defeat your opponents’ methods to infiltrate, you can certainly make it impossible to hide and this is where the investment should be made.  The adversary here must carry out multiple steps to accomplish their objective and catching them early in this lifecycle is the only strategy that is feasible at this point.  If you can’t stop them from infiltrating, you must stop them before exfiltration of the data.”

Tags: Breachdata breach
ShareTweet
Previous Post

Cyber criminals increasingly drawn to Tor anonymity and hidden services

Next Post

Black hats drawn to TOR software

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol