Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Wednesday, 3 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

US retailers to establish intelligence sharing centre

by The Gurus
May 15, 2014
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A group of US retailers have collected together to in order to prevent further breaches and protect customer information.
 
According to ABCNews, Nike, Lowes Target, Gap and Walgreen have launched an intelligence sharing centre with the Retail Industry Leaders Association to allow retailers to share information about data breaches and potential threats and also inform members of law enforcement and industry analysts.
 
Sandy Kennedy, president of the association, told ABC News that cyber crime was one of the biggest challenges facing retailers, and that this was “really in everyone’s interest”.
 
“Criminals are getting more and more sophisticated. We’re looking at how we can deal with this long term,” he said. “All of our members have been focused on this for a long time. Our goal is to make sure the data is protected and that if criminals do get into data, it’s in a form that they can’t use.”
 
Amichai Shulman, CTO of Imperva, said that this idea is usually good, but warned that information security people in commercial organisations are swamped with day to day tasks, and often struggle to keep up with the load of operating their environment.
 
“I find it hard to believe that they have resources and time to launch their own intelligence processing organisation and I also question the economic viability of each organisation independently processing intelligence information,” he said.
 
“I think that the right thing to do is transform this into a shared intelligence gathering and processing centre that receives information from the participating organisations, and employs the people to transform this information into actionable data for the individual members – in the form of reputation or pattern feeds for example.”
 
Barmak Meftah, CEO AlienVault, who have pioneered open sharing through the Open Threat Exchange, said: “This is a good move, as other industry groups – like the financial services industry with the FS-ISAC – have proven the value of threat sharing across and between organisations. Especially given the retail industry needs to work that much harder to rebuild consumer trust. But I do question whether it is enough to simply limit threat sharing to specific players within specific vertical industries.
 
“Big retailers have the big budgets to invest in security, but the only way we can make the world less of a ‘target-rich environment’ for cyber crimin
als, is for all organisations to have the proper security products and threat sharing capabilities in place. The determination of the retail industry to share threat data is all fine and good, but the technology at the heart of all this sharing needs to be within reach of all organisations, and it needs to help facilitate this sharing easily.”

 
Rahul Kashyup, head of security research at Bromium, said: “Enterprises need to be extremely cautious about sharing attack, compromise or threat data, because this potentially has tremendous consequences in a regulatory environment. Moreover, given the increasingly litigious stance of shareholders after the Target breach, it could expose companies to lawsuits.”

Tags: IntelligenceRetailSharing
ShareTweet
Previous Post

A quarter of attacks target SQL Injection flaws

Next Post

Report causes erroneous arguments

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol