Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Thursday, 4 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Point-of-sale security in a bad state, according to Kaspersky analysis of Backoff

by The Gurus
September 2, 2014
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The success of the Backoff remote access Trojan (RAT) paints a very bleak picture of the state of point-of-sale security, according to Kaspersky Lab.
 
In an evaluation, Kaspersky Lab said that after sinkholing two servers, it has seen more than 85 victims connecting to its sinkhole, and its sinkhole covers less than five per cent of the command and control (C&C) channels.
 
“Taking into account the U.S. Secret Service statement, it’s a pretty safe bet that the number of Backoff infections at businesses in North America is well north of 1,000,” it said.
 
“Since its appearance last year, Backoff has not changed dramatically. The author created both non-obfuscated and obfuscated samples. This was likely done to defeat the security controls on the targeted networks. However, the defences running on a PoS terminal and/or network should not have been affected by this. This speaks volumes about the current state of PoS security, and other cyber criminals are sure to have taken note.”
 
Kaspersky confirmed that it sinkholed two servers that Backoff samples used to communicate with their masters that were compiled between January – March 2014.
 
Dr. Mike Lloyd, CTO of RedSeal, said: “The significance of the so-called ‘Backoff’ malware is that it reminds businesses and consumers that all our infrastructure is connected now. In the past, there were air gaps – ATM machines weren’t on the same network as point of sale devices, and all the banking infrastructure was separate from the power companies.
 
“However, the spread of Internet connectivity (including the Internet of Things) means the old and lazy assumption of ‘you can’t get there from here’ is out the window. Defence is now about controlled network segmentation— making sure you take the trouble to build perimeters around the assets you must defend. This is harder than old-world air gap-based defences, and requires constant oversight to look for holes in the virtual fence.”
 
Jérôme Segura, senior security researcher at Malwarebytes, said: “In late July, the Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) issued a warning about the Backoff point-of-sale malware in an effort to provide technical details as well as recommendations for affected businesses. While at the time it wasn’t clear how widespread the problem was, we now know that more than a thousand US companies have been hit since October 2013.
 
“This allows us to connect the dots between the recent data breaches affecting retailers that had one thing in common: The Backoff malware. Attackers relied on insecure networks that could be penetrated through brute force attacks via remote desktop applications. Once in, the Backoff malware, which was invisible to antivirus products, could start burying itself into the system and wait for the next card swipe into the PoS computer.
 
“In addition to keeping their PoS systems updated and running security solutions such as antivirus and anti-malware, companies need to review their remote access policies, segregate their networks and have network traffic tools to detect potential data exfiltration.”

ShareTweet
Previous Post

North Korea has cyber attack cells in China, South Korea and Japan, say HP

Next Post

The Con is on in London

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol