Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Thursday, 4 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

12 year siphoning campaign hit German companies from UK websites

by The Gurus
September 4, 2014
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A massive cybercrime network which penetrated hundreds of blue-chip companies, Government institutions, research laboratories and critical infrastructure facilities was facilitated for 12 years by the incorporation of over 800 false companies registered in the UK.
 
According to research by Cybertinel, the espionage system was traced back to over 800 front companies registered in UK and to German individuals who operated the espionage network.
 
Named the ‘Harkonnen Operation’, the network performed numerous targeted penetrations on over 300 organisations and planted Trojans in specific workstations in the organisations, gaining access to sensitive confidential documents and information and silently siphoning them to the organisations who ordered the attack.
 
It reported that the organisation invests tens of thousands of Euros every year installing and maintaining IT security systems and tools. Those behind it are described as “very skilled” who work according to the latest security standards and threat warnings.
 
Also, a lack of interest in British firms in purchasing SSL security certificates were exploited by the network, enabling them to create pseudo legitimate internet service names and use them to camouflage their fraudulent activity.
 
Jonathan Gad of Elite Cyber Solutions, Cybertinel’s UK partner, said: “The network exploited the UK’s relatively tolerant requirements for purchasing SSL security certificates, and established British front companies so they could emulate legitimate web services. The German attackers behind the network then had total control over the targeted computers and were able to carry out their espionage undisturbed for many years.
 
“At this point, we are aware of the extent of the network, but the damage to the organisations who have been victims in terms of loss of valuable data, income or the exposure of information related to employees and customers is immeasurable.”
 
The ‘Harkonnen Operation’ began on 14th June 2013 using spear phishing messages which carried two Trojan variants. Once installed, hundreds of domain names, IP addresses and Wildcard certificates were acquired on behalf of these front companies at an estimated expense of $150,000 to camouflage fraudulent activity as legitimate services.
 
Mark Sparshott, EMEA director at Proofpoint, said: “Cybertinel’s report confirms yet again that spear-phishing is the weapon of choice for targeted attacks and, most worryingly, that they breeze through email and web gateways, next-generation firewalls and multiple anti-virus layers completely undetected.
 
“There are new technologies designed specifically to protect against spear-phishing, longlining attacks and other advanced email attacks. So it is high time that senior executives, who are often targeted, ask their security teams why they are not using these additional technologies in the face of such a clear risk and obvious hole in their security.”

ShareTweet
Previous Post

Goodwill admits breach was enabled by attack on third party

Next Post

LinkedIn announce security and privacy additions

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol