Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Thursday, 4 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

5 Common Mistakes to Avoid in Cyber Incident Response

by The Gurus
July 1, 2016
in This Week's Gurus
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Steven Chabinsky, CrowdStrike’s General Counsel and Chief Risk Officer
Network intrusions have become a fact of corporate life. A breach can not only be damaging to a brand’s reputation, but is increasingly factored in as one of the many costs of doing business. The impact of a breach depends upon a number of factors, including what assets are at stake and how quickly the breach is detected, contained, and remediated. Here are some mistakes that if prevented, companies can recover faster and more effectively after an incident.
Avoidable Delays
With the average cost of a data breach totaling $3.8 million, you would expect companies to focus on the proactive detection of threats. Unfortunately, in today’s business world many struggle to efficiently and effectively detect intrusions, assess the extent of the compromise and engage the right level of assistance to remediate the problem. This had led to significant delays in breach detection and a rising remediation costs.
In particular, many businesses lack the necessary tools to perform proactive detection. A tendency to rely on internal personnel to fight fires without the necessary automation and managed response also compunds the challenge. Whether it’s a call to outside legal counsel, a computer incident response firm, a public relations/crisis management company, or all three, potential engagements should be pre-arranged. Contracts should be signed and ready to go, costing your company nothing unless and until you use them, but allowing for quick deployment.
Communicating with the hackers
Many companies that have been breached still use their internal systems to communicate about the incident. Whether it’s documenting a company’s incident response efforts and findings, or emailing others to enlist their help, using compromised systems as a method of communication is a bad idea. After all, unless hackers are removed, they could very well be reading those communications. If all-employee emails relating to an incident are required, such as to change passwords, businesses should consider them as routine IT requests until they are confident the hackers are out.
Pulling the Plug
For many, the first reaction upon spotting a hacker on the network is to pull the computer plug straight out of the wall. Yet, removing the power from a computer not only results in lost volatile memory, (much of which can be critical to a forensic investigation, and should be imaged), but may also lead the intruder to establish other points of entry. Action must be taken immediately to isolate key assets. Businesses should consider limiting remote connectivity or perhaps taking some systems offline. For those systems that continue to allow external network access, it is important to closely monitor Internet entry points to identify hacker activity in outbound network traffic.
Lost Logs 
When it comes to effective incident detection, containment and remediation of the value of log files is critical. Hackers attempt to cover their tracks by deleting or modifying evidence of their crimes, making it important to employ techniques such as duplicating logs, limiting access to them and having log files append rather than overwrite, establishing separate logging servers and using write-once media.
Moving on like nothing happened
Whether hackers are stopped at the border or removed after a successful intrusion, it is important to re-examine significant events, capture lessons learned and revise incident response processes based on this. It also is helpful to gather real-world examples experienced by your company when conducting workforce training. Surprisingly, very few companies include actual events when conducting information security training, deferring instead entirely to hypothetical situations.
Cyber risk mitigation starts with anticipating and detecting potential threats  and being prepared to defend against new tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). Emerging intrusion trends require a new approach to proactive defense that includes active real-time hunting and detection, prevention, and investigation capabilities that are geared to defend against increasingly stealthy attacks.
Ultimately, when it comes down to anticipating and dealing with a network intrusion, preparation is key. If resources are in place and a fully tested response plan is lined up in advance of an incident, any damage can be remediated before it is too late.
 
About the Author: Steven Chabinsky is General Counsel and Chief Risk Officer for the cybersecurity technology firm CrowdStrike. He was appointed by President Obama to the White House Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity. Previously, he was Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI’s Cyber Division. You can follow him on Twitter @StevenChabinsky. 

ShareTweet
Previous Post

Over-stretched IT security pros spend more time fire-fighting than doing meaningful security work

Next Post

Industry’s First Cyber Weapons Study Reveals the Tools Attackers Use After Breaking into a Network

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol