Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Thursday, 4 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

6 ways you are sabotaging your cyber defences

by The Gurus
July 19, 2018
in This Week's Gurus
cybersecurity
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

If we asked any of the IT departments that we deal on a daily basis about their current priorities, they would all unfailingly say that protecting their company against cyber attacks and data breaches is top of the list – particularly now that GDPR is finally in force.

 

However, despite high awareness of the risks in terms of reputational damage, regulatory penalties and commercial losses, it’s evident that a surprisingly high proportion of companies – from SMEs to global corporations – are burying their heads in the sand when it comes to shoring up their cyber defences.

 

Here are 6 ways that we see companies failing to minimise their chances of suffering an information breach.

 

  • Neglecting security until it’s too late

This is a far more common story than you would imagine. The reason? Until they’ve been targeted by cyber criminals, many companies still won’t recognise the very real likelihood – and potentially devastating impact – of a security breach. They think they can get away with not spending money until a crisis occurs.

 

Firstly, if there was a system to rate the cyber security threat at an individual company level, it would be severe – an attack is highly likely. Nearly half of all businesses in the UK were hit by a cyber attack in the last 12 months, with 38 new ransomware attacks being reported every day. Secondly, as we tell clients – prepare for disaster, recover faster!

 

  • Thinking you can prevent breaches

In the security world, preparation doesn’t mean prevention. We are all engaged in a constant battle with ever-more sophisticated cyber criminals, and attacks are going to happen. Your security strategy should focus on defence but also response. Early identification and containment is absolutely vital. Once an attacker has infiltrated a laptop or email system, can they then roam freely around your entire network? Think of them like physical intruders, who will try any route. You’ve designed the building so install fire doors to slow them down!

 

  • Not defining your business-critical data assets

Many organisations, especially those who have been hit by a breach and are in panic mode, haven’t covered off one of the basics: defining information assets and ranking them by priority in order to conduct a proper risk assessment. In essence, this crucial step is about understanding what you hold, its importance to the business and specific security risks. Only then can you make informed decisions and put the right measures in place.

 

  • Not testing defences appropriately 

It’s well-recognised that companies should conduct an independent review of their information security posture every 12 months. But we find that a security testing strategy needs to be more flexible than this. A rigid annual review can expose you to vulnerabilities if you’ve installed new software or servers, for instance. Ideally, a pen test should be carried out after any significant change to your IT infrastructure.

 

  • Over-relying on tech

Security is a process, not a product – and to mitigate the risks associated with social engineering, this is a fundamental lesson to take to heart. Overlooking the human angle will cause even the most advanced technical barriers to crumble. Train your staff, refresh that training, embed it into HR procedures and regular team meetings, put policies and procedures in place – and check that they are followed. Clients often tell us that they have the tightest security policies known to man – yet nobody is monitoring how well staff understand and adhere to them. Remember that the workforce is your frontline defence.

 

  • Resistance to change

Is the IT or senior management team open to challenging existing ways of working, such as by bringing in external security advisors? It’s important to be honest with yourself about the capacity and limitations of your in-house resources. There is no room for being defensive or territorial in IT security – in fact those attitudes could lead to very serious problems, particularly under the GDPR which makes data protection everybody’s business. Risk assessments and decision-making needs to be objective – and sometimes that’s easier to hear from a third-party.

 

Of course, many of these fundamental processes are a requirement for ISO 27001-certified firms, but even then we find that there is often an emphasis on box-ticking and meeting initial standards, which tend to lapse over time. An effective information security framework needs to be continually refreshed and honed – with a security mindset embedded into your company’s culture at every level.

Tags: CybersecurityTechnology
ShareTweet
Previous Post

Attention all passengers: Airport networks are putting you at risk!

Next Post

Cyber Security Incidents: Insider Threat falls in UK (to 65%) and Germany (to 75%) post GDPR, but US risk increases (to 80%)

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol