Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Saturday, 27 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Cyber insurance claims fall as businesses refuse ransom payments and recover themselves

by Lara Joseph
August 19, 2024
in News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Databarracks’ Data Health Check – an annual survey of 500 UK IT decision makers – found that while more organisations than ever have cyber insurance, the number of claims is down.

66% of those surveyed report having insurance specifically for cyber in 2024, rising from 51% over the past two years. But as more organisations take out policies, just 36% made a claim this year, falling from 58% in 2022.

These findings are likely linked to an increasing number of ransomware recoveries. In previous years, the majority of organisations chose to pay out in the event of an attack.

This has drastically changed in 2024, with twice as many organisations able to recover from backups rather than meeting the demands of ransomware groups.

The amount organisations are claiming has also decreased, with claims over £1 million decreasing from 48% to just 16% in 2024.

James Watts, Managing Director at Databarracks, commented:

“We have long speculated about the negative effect of cyber insurance policies on ransomware. Organisations were incentivised to pay ransoms instead of refusing, leading to a vicious cycle of payments. The nascent cyber insurance market suddenly became unsustainable.

“But then things changed. As our Data Health Check found last year, cyber insurance prices increased significantly and the requirements to obtain cover became stricter. The result was that the bar of preparedness was raised.

“That change has had a fantastic impact on businesses resilience. Insurers now ask important questions like: are backups are separate and air-gapped from production data, are they encrypted, do you have a Business Continuity Plan and have you tested your recovery?

“In previous years, more organisations would pay the ransom than recover themselves. This year we can see a dramatic shift, with organisations now twice as likely to recover from backups rather than pay a ransom.

“While paying may seem like the quick, low-cost solution – that’s rarely the case. There’s no guarantee that you will get your data back and choosing to pay also cements your reputation as an easy target.

“As more organisations take out insurance specifically for cyber incidents, there are two positive outcomes. Firstly, it ensures that businesses are financially protected in the event of an attack.

“Secondly, it encourages organisations to meet industry standards for resilience. As insurers become increasingly strict about their requirements, the importance of thoroughly tested Business Continuity Plans – as well as immutable, air-gapped backups – is reinforced.

“This is the influence we hope insurance can have on the cyber landscape. Legislating and banning all payments is problematic for a number of reasons, so one of the few factors that could disrupt the growth of ransomware is this shift in the industry.

“The effectiveness of decryption tools can’t be guaranteed, so there are only two viable options. Pay the ransom or recover from backups.

“It is vital that all organisations have the means and confidence to recover quickly, inexpensively and with minimal impact to operations.”

Read the highlights from the Data Health Check 2024: https://datahealthcheck.databarracks.com/2024/

Download the full DHC report: https://www.databarracks.com/resources/data-health-check-2024

ShareTweet
Previous Post

AI-powered cyber threats are too overpowering for over 50% of security teams

Next Post

Dodging the Cyber Bullet: Early Signs of a Ransomware Attack

Recent News

Keeper Security launches Microsoft Teams integration for privileged access management

Keeper Security launches Microsoft Teams integration for privileged access management

June 26, 2026
UK Museums Are a Cyber Incident Waiting to Happen and the Government Knows It

UK Museums Are a Cyber Incident Waiting to Happen and the Government Knows It

June 25, 2026
pqc

New Forescout Data Reveals Slow Progress Toward Quantum-Safe Security

June 24, 2026
AI-Powered Phishing Attacks Surge 1,380% as Criminal Platforms Render MFA Obsolete

AI-Powered Phishing Attacks Surge 1,380% as Criminal Platforms Render MFA Obsolete

June 24, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol