Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Wednesday, 3 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Common beliefs on cyber insurance refused

by The Gurus
May 19, 2014
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Only a third of 250 security professionals would bother getting cyber insurance, while two-thirds (63 per cent) believe insurers would not actually honour a claim if one was made.
 
The research by AppRiver found that 32 per cent of UK businesses don’t bother seeking this increasingly vital cover.Jim Tyer, EMEA channel director for AppRiver, who conducted the survey at this year’s Infosecurity Europe conference, said that findings were “alarming” that there was so little faith in the insurance industry.
 
“An interesting calculation is that the probability of special measures being a requirement is at least one in every four policies. What this means for those respondents we spoke with during the show who were either unsure if their organisation had cover, and even those that did have cover but were unsure if they’d had to do anything different, 28 per cent would find their policies (if they have one) invalid due to this mandate. That’s worryingly high,” he said.
 
None of the respondents spoken with who had cyber liability insurance had had to make a claim on their policy. Tyer adds, “While this could be viewed as positive, it did raise two thoughts. Firstly, it means there’s no reassurance for the 63 per cent of respondents whose faith in insurance is non-existent, unfortunately.
 
“However, more importantly, the likelihood that no-one has suffered a breach is unlikely meaning either a percentage of people lied, hadn’t made a claim even though they’d suffered a breach or, in my opinion, the most probable: they are blissfully unaware of their current security posture! Not a particularly comforting thought.”
 
In an email to IT Security Guru, Beth Diamond, leader of the claims management team for privacy liability at the Beazley Group, admitted that there is more penetration into the market to accomplish and she sees newly insured companies looking at risk regularly, but too often it was after having suffered a breach and been without cover or assistance in responding.
 
Commenting on the 63 per cent statistic, she said she “smiles each time I am asked this question”.
 
“I am the global claims team leader for our technology, media and cyber group at Beazley, having joined the company in January 2006. I have been handling cyber claims from my earliest time at Beazley and can tell you from personal knowledge that not only have we paid out and continue to pay out material sums on cyber matters, but I have handled personally the largest cyber claims impacting Beazley insured, paying seven and eight figure sums (sometime policy limits) on cyber matters,” she said.
 
“I suspect that the media surrounding coverage disputes on cyber claims has created confusion about coverage generally for cyber, but cyber coverage from Beazley is real. That does not mean it is the proverbial ‘blank check’ and it is important that insured companies understand how coverage works. Not only how to maximise the coverage available, but understand that the coverage is there and it is real.”

Tags: Insurance
ShareTweet
Previous Post

Tenable release enterprise management for Nessus

Next Post

Google adds security functionality to Gmail and apps

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol