Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Wednesday, 3 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Most organisations not confident in ability to protect data after data breach

by The Gurus
June 14, 2016
in Editor's News
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Despite the increasing number of data breaches and more than 3.9 billion data records worldwide being lost or stolen since 2013, organisations continue to believe perimeter security technologies are effective against data breaches. This is one of the many findings of the third-annual Data Security Confidence Index released today by Gemalto, (Euronext NL0000400653 GTO), the world leader in digital security.
Of the 1,100 IT decision makers surveyed worldwide, 61% said their perimeter security systems (firewall, IDPS, AV, content filtering, anomaly detection, etc.) were very effective at keeping unauthorised users out of their network. However, 69% said they are not confident their organization’s data would be secure if their perimeter security was breached. This is up from 66% in 2015 and 59% in 2014. Furthermore, 66% believe unauthorised users can access their network and nearly two in five (16%) said unauthorised users could access their entire network.
“This research shows that there is indeed a big divide between perception and reality when it comes to the effectiveness of perimeter security,” said Jason Hart, Vice President and Chief Technology Officer for Data Protection at Gemalto. “The days of breach prevention are over, yet many IT organisations continue to rely on perimeter security as the foundation of their security strategies. The new reality is that IT professionals need to shift their mindset from breach prevention to breach acceptance and focus more on securing the breach by protecting the data itself and the users accessing the data.”
Perimeter security is a focus, but not a panacea for data breaches
According to the research findings, 78% of IT decision makers said they had adjusted their strategies as a result of high profile data breaches, up from 71% in 2015 and up 53% in 2014. 86% said they had increased spending on perimeter security and 85% believe that their current investments are going to the right security technologies.
Despite the increased focus on perimeter security, the findings show the reality many organisations face when it comes to preventing data breaches. 64% of those surveyed said their organisations experienced a breach at some time over the past five years. More than a quarter (27%) said they experienced a breach in the past 12 months, with a similar number of IT decision makers (30%) reporting the same frequency in 2015. This suggests that organisations have not made significant improvements in reducing the number of data breaches despite increased investments in perimeter security.
“While companies are confident in the amount of spending and where they are spending it, it’s clear the security protocols they are employing are not living up to expectations. While protecting the perimeter is important, organisations need to come to the realisation that they need a layered approach to security in the event the perimeter is breached. By employing tools such as end-to-end encryption and two-factor authentication across the network and the cloud, they can protect the whole organisation and, most importantly, the data,” concluded Hart.
 
To download the entire report, click here.

ShareTweet
Previous Post

Cybercrime experts to monitor “drive-by downloads” at European Football Championships

Next Post

Japan travel agency fears leak of 7.93 million records, passport details

Recent News

Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026
Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

Acumen Cyber and AttackIQ Partner to Strengthen Cyber Defense Validation

May 29, 2026
Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

Check Point Launches AI Agents That Think Like Attackers as Autonomous Exploitation Reaches Critical Threat Level

May 28, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol