Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Wednesday, 24 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Attackers Use Legitimate Forensic Driver to Disable Endpoint Security, Huntress Warns

by Guru Writer
February 5, 2026
in Featured
Attackers Use Legitimate Forensic Driver to Disable Endpoint Security, Huntress Warns
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Cybercriminals are increasingly turning trusted software against defenders, according to new research from Huntress, which has uncovered a real-world attack in which threat actors used a legitimate but vulnerable driver to disable endpoint security tools before deploying further malicious activity.

In a detailed incident response analysis, Huntress researchers observed attackers abusing an outdated EnCase forensic driver as part of a technique known as Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD). The approach allowed the attackers to gain kernel-level access on compromised systems and systematically terminate endpoint detection and response (EDR) processes designed to stop them.

Killing Security Tools Before Launching the Attack

Rather than immediately deploying malware or ransomware, the attackers focused first on neutralising defensive controls. By loading the vulnerable driver, they were able to issue kernel-level commands, which are among the most privileged areas of the operating system, thereby blinding security tools running on the endpoint.

According to Huntress, this method highlights a growing trend in which attackers prioritise disabling security products before executing their primary objectives, reducing the likelihood of detection and response.

“This wasn’t a proof-of-concept or lab exercise,” Huntress noted. “The technique was identified during an active intrusion, giving defenders a rare look at how attackers are adapting their tactics to bypass modern endpoint protections.”

Weaponising Trusted Software

The driver used in the attack originated from legitimate forensic software and carried a valid digital signature, despite its certificate having expired years earlier. Because Windows systems may still load such drivers under certain conditions, attackers can exploit known vulnerabilities to carry out malicious actions.

Huntress warned that this tactic exposes a significant blind spot for organisations that rely heavily on endpoint security tools but do not enforce strict driver control policies.

“Attackers don’t always need custom malware when they can repurpose trusted components already recognised by the operating system,” the researchers explained.

Implications for Defenders

The incident underscores the importance of hardening systems beyond traditional endpoint protection alone. Huntress recommends that organisations review their use of driver block lists, enable virtualisation-based security features such as memory integrity, and ensure strong authentication, including multi-factor authentication, is enforced on remote access points.

As attackers continue to adopt BYOVD techniques, defenders may need to rethink assumptions about what constitutes “trusted” software within their environments.

Huntress researchers say they expect similar techniques to become more common as threat actors seek reliable ways to evade detection and disable security controls early in the attack lifecycle.

ShareTweet
Previous Post

AI and Regulation Redefine Application Security, New Global Study Finds

Next Post

Proton Warns European Startups: No One Is Too Small to Be Targeted by Hackers

Recent News

Quantum computing: The data security conundrum

Trump Sets Post-Quantum Security Deadlines as White House Warns of Advanced Cryptographic Threats

June 23, 2026

Experts Warn: Passwords Still Winning Despite Passwordless Push

June 23, 2026
How Do Online Gaming Sites Keep Players and Their Data Safe?

KnowBe4 awarded in the email security industry

June 23, 2026
NHS cyber resilience deal signals shift toward specialist MSSPs, says Check Point

NHS cyber resilience deal signals shift toward specialist MSSPs, says Check Point

June 23, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol