International Cyber Expo International Cyber Expo
  • About Us
Saturday, 17 October, 2026
IT Security Guru
International Cyber Expo
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Filigran Adds AI-Powered Attack Chaining to OpenAEV for Autonomous Pentesting

by Guru Writer
September 1, 2026
in Featured, Uncategorized
attack chaining
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Filigran has launched a new attack chaining capability for its OpenAEV platform, designed to help security teams test how multiple weaknesses can be combined to create a viable path through an organisation’s environment.

Released as part of OpenAEV v3, Attack Chaining allows penetration tests and red team exercises to adapt dynamically based on what a simulated attack discovers. Rather than testing individual techniques in isolation or following a fixed sequence, the platform can use findings from one stage, such as credentials, permissions or an open port, to determine what happens next.

The approach is intended to more closely reflect how real attackers operate, where an apparently minor weakness can provide the foothold needed to reach another system and ultimately sensitive data or critical assets.

From individual vulnerabilities to attack paths

Traditional security validation can be effective at establishing whether a particular technique or control works. However, Filigran argues that this can miss the wider risk created when weaknesses are combined.

Its recent State of Threat Management report found that 97% of organisations have difficulty determining whether their exposures are actually exploitable, while 84% said attacks they face often exploit risks that were already known but had not been prioritised. The study, conducted among 550 security decision-makers and practitioners, also found that 88% rely to some extent on manual processes for offensive attack simulation.

Attack Chaining attempts to address that gap by treating the result of each simulated action as an input for the next. A discovered credential, for example, could be tested against another system. If successful, the simulation could continue deeper into the environment. If a security control blocks the attempt, the chain can stop or take another route.

“Security validation has to evolve with the way attackers operate. The goal is no longer just to prove that we can block individual techniques; it is to understand whether those techniques can be combined into a path that leads to a real compromise,” said Julien Richard, co-founder of Filigran. “As adversaries become more adaptive and increasingly use AI to move faster, we need validation that can keep pace.”

AI takes on the red team

The new capability can be operated manually, autonomously through AI agents, or using a combination of the two. In operator-led mode, security teams define the attack logic and control execution themselves. In agent-led mode, a user instead provides an objective and scope in natural language, after which an AI agent can construct and adapt the attack chain according to the findings it encounters.

This could include generating phishing emails and landing pages as part of social engineering exercises.

Filigran said the agent remains subject to predefined scope controls and its decisions are logged, providing security teams with an audit trail of how the simulation reached a particular outcome. The development builds on Filigran’s wider push into agentic security automation. The company launched XTM One in June, introducing AI orchestration across OpenCTI and OpenAEV to automate workflows spanning threat intelligence, attack scenario generation, validation and remediation guidance.

Mapping the route to critical assets

OpenAEV v3 also introduces a live attack path graph that allows teams to watch a simulation progress through their environment. Each hop, branch and finding is displayed as the exercise takes place, allowing defenders to see how far the simulated attacker progressed and which security control eventually stopped it.

Filigran said this could help organisations identify “chokepoints” within attack paths. Instead of treating every vulnerability encountered during an exercise as equally urgent, teams can identify the control or weakness whose remediation would break the wider attack chain.

“A validation outcome is only actionable when security teams can trace the logic that generated it,” said Jean-Philippe Salles, VP of Product Management at Filigran. “With OpenAEV v3, teams can build or generate attack scenarios, watch attack paths unfold, and inspect the logic and evidence behind every step.”

OpenAEV v3 expands AI security testing

Alongside Attack Chaining, OpenAEV v3 includes a redesigned dashboard called the Adversarial Exposure Command Center, bringing security posture, simulation results and detection coverage into a single interface.

The release also adds an Adversarial Exposure Score for tracking validation results across exposure sources, automated reporting and AI red-teaming injectors which allows organisations to run adversarial simulations against LLM-powered agents and chatbots using the same validation engine employed to test traditional controls including EDR, SIEM and email defences.

OpenAEV v3 is available immediately, with Attack Chaining included in the platform’s Enterprise Edition.

ShareTweet
Previous Post

7 Ways to Boost Conversions on Your Website

Next Post

Exabeam Accelerates Global Channel Momentum As Exabeam APEX Partner Program Drives Measurable Growth

Recent News

OpenAI-Hugging Face Incident: What We Know

Forescout uncovers ROMULUS malware delivery platform behind ClickFix attacks

October 16, 2026
Nearly Half of Organisations Report Unauthorised AI Agent Actions, Research Finds

Nearly Half of Organisations Report Unauthorised AI Agent Actions, Research Finds

October 14, 2026
Fake WatchGuard VPN site steals credentials, then serves the genuine signed client

Fake WatchGuard VPN site steals credentials, then serves the genuine signed client

October 14, 2026
Check Point and Illumio Team Up to Advance Zero Trust with Unified Security and Threat Prevention

Zero Trust in Practice: Moving Beyond the Buzzword

October 14, 2026

Eskenzi PR banner ad

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2026 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2026 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol